Ravi Mishra, a University of Pennsylvania junior double majoring in engineering and business who still describes his location as “Silicon Valley, California”, writes a blog post titled Where Entrepreneurship Comes to Die.
He tears apart his fellow b-schoolers’ business ideas with an entertaining vengeance usually only seen in a venture capitalist (I wonder what he scored on the VCAT), which includes building the craigslist for college students (as if craigslist isn’t the craigslist for college students) and a plan to bring the campus meal plan off campus.
Yet Ravi doesn’t lay all the blame on his Ivy compatriots. He says of the class:
And Penn wonders why their precious school doesn’t churn out high profile start ups. So where’s the problem? In this case, part of it is apparent: the class itself is atrocious. For half a semester, I’ve listened to our Professor use the same Marketing 101 buzzwords in an attempt to describe what is different about getting the word out for start ups. And, for that half a semester, he’s really said nothing.
Is this an example of teaching entrepreneurship gone wrong or is teaching entrepreneurship a hopeless pursuit altogether? Or, perhaps, does Ravi just not recognize truly genius business ideas?